The Federal High Court in Abuja presided over by Justice Umar on Tuesday rescheduled the cybercrime trial of the Senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, to November 24.
The new hearing date was fixed on October 21, following the resumption of court activities that were stalled the previous day due to the #FreeNnamdiKanu protest organised by activist Omoyele Sowore.
Recall that the protest had disrupted proceedings on October 20, the initial date slated for the trial in the Court.
On Monday, Justice Umar’s courtroom, located on the third floor of the Federal High Court, was under lock and key as judicial activities were grounded.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, is alleged to have transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intent to malign, incite, endanger lives, and breach public order.
The senator is accused of alleging, during a gathering on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi State, that the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, instructed former Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello, to have her killed in the state.
She was further alleged to have repeated the claims during a television interview, stating that both men plotted to eliminate her in Kogi.
The charge was brought under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024.
Justice Umar had earlier, on September 22, adjourned the matter following an objection raised by the defence.
Recall that lawmaker was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Mohammed Abubakar.
She was granted bail thereafter, and the case was adjourned to September 22 for commencement of trial.
However, on the last adjourned date, when prosecuting counsel David Kaswe was about to call the first witness, the defence counsel, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, raised a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction.
West-Idahosa , who told the court that the objection was not against the nature of the charge but on grounds of alleged abuse of prosecutorial powers by the Attorney General of the Federation, also complained that the defence had not been served with the statements of the prosecution witnesses.
Although Kaswe argued that the objection should not stall the day’s proceedings, Justice Umar ruled that the prosecution must first respond to the defence’s objection before the case could proceed.
Justice Umar said he would determine the objection before taking any further steps in the matter.
